ATTENTION!
Iran Ballistic Missile capacity (SITREP)—how much longer can they sustain these barrages?
It’s just past 0200 local in Tel Aviv time now.
Iran has over 3,000 ballistic missiles but cannot launch all simultaneously (they’ve already launched 8 waves). Current evidence leans toward a maximum of around 180-200 missiles launched at once in recent attacks. It seems very likely that infrastructure limits simultaneous launches to far below 3,000.
Iran possesses a significant ballistic missile arsenal, estimated at over 3,000 missiles, making it the largest in the Middle East. However, the capacity to launch all these missiles at once is constrained by logistical and strategic factors, including the number of launch platforms and the nature of their deployment.
Recent military actions show Iran launching up to 180-200 missiles in a single strike. These numbers are significantly lower than 3,000, indicating a limit to simultaneous launch capacity.
Iran's infrastructure and launch capacity, including transporter-erector-launchers (TELs) and underground facilities, does not support launching 3,000 missiles at once. The focus on sequential or ripple-fire systems further supports this limitation.
My assessment is Iran is getting toward the end of their ballistic missile capacity (for a variety of reasons). They likely still retain hundreds but their ability to launch very large numbers is hindered by infrastructure destruction over the past several days as well as launch capabilities.
That said, DO NOT underestimate Iran’s ability to do as much as humanly possible to attempt to destroy Israel. That has been their stated goal for years and until there is regime change to someone more aligned with Israel and the west, expect this war to continue.
Iran's ballistic missile program has been a focal point of regional and international security discussions for many years, particularly given its implications for Middle Eastern stability and global non-proliferation efforts.
Iran's ballistic missile inventory comprises a diverse array of short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) and medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). One notable development is an automated missile launch system revealed since 2020, capable of positioning up to five fully fueled ballistic missiles on an underground railcar for sequential ripple-fire through a single vertical shaft. This is what Israel is facing now. Barrages of dozens of these simultaneously and my assessment is more to come.
Strategic and Logistical Considerations
Launching 3,000 missiles simultaneously would require an unprecedented number of launch platforms and coordination, likely exceeding Iran's current capabilities. Strategically, such an action would deplete Iran's entire arsenal, leaving it vulnerable to counterattacks.
Our Israeli allies need to prepare for another round of massive amounts of missiles. Iran—you better get ready for a strategic counteroffensive. The Israelis have planned this war for a long time and my sense is that they are far more ready than you, particularly their population. The Iranian people DO NOT want to suffer any longer under their brutal tyrannical regime.
This war will end with a clear victor.
America’s political leadership must be clear about the purpose of every conflict that puts our people, our security, and our resources at risk.
What outcomes are we trying to achieve?
What conditions would tell us the mission has succeeded?
Who will verify those conditions?
These are practical questions. In the Middle East, military action must serve a defined political objective along with a path to ending the fighting. In Europe, every American commitment should be measured against a realistic prospect for peace. We should know what we are asking our allies to do, what negotiations are meant to accomplish, and what would allow the United States to reduce its involvement responsibly.
A strike can destroy a target. Another shipment can sustain a fight. Neither, by itself, tells us how a war ends. If circumstances change or the objective proves unreachable, we must have the discipline to reassess, and if necessary, change our course.
Continuing along the same path because we have already ...
On October 14th, join me in Washington, D.C. for the Gold Institute’s Second Annual Indo-Pacific Summit.
We are bringing together ambassadors, government officials, national security experts, and business leaders for an important discussion about the future of the U.S.–Korea alliance and the security of the Indo-Pacific.
The alliance between our two nations was forged through tremendous sacrifice. This summit is an opportunity to remember our history while having the serious conversations necessary to strengthen this relationship for the future.
When you vote this November, understand you’re voting for our constitutional republic based on American values and a functioning rule of law (despite the challenges we still face in parts of our federal government).
If you don’t vote for those American values, we will eventually face this challenge addressed by the imam in this “pro sharia law in America” video.
Get out and vote for Patriots and conservatives who want America to remain strong, prosperous and free.
As Board Chairman of the Gold Institute for International Strategy, I am proud to share this important publication examining the future of the Korea-U.S. alliance and the opportunities it presents for both nations.
The Korea-U.S. alliance is more than a security partnership. It is an economic and strategic relationship with a growing footprint right here in the United States.
Korean investment is supporting American jobs and expanding operations across the country. At the same time, there are important opportunities to connect U.S. Forces Korea veterans with Korean companies operating in America, putting their experience, leadership, and understanding of the alliance to work here at home.
Strong alliances should produce tangible benefits for both nations: greater security, stronger economies, expanded investment, American jobs, and new opportunities for the men and women who served to protect our shared interests.
I encourage you to read “Make Korea-US Alliance Great Again” and consider ...
Breaking: Our 2nd Amendment is at risk (again).
A firearm crosses a state line. Years later, someone else possesses it in one state. Does that give Washington DC the power to regulate that possession under the Commerce Clause?
America’s Future, where I serve as Board Chairman, has joined an amicus brief in United States v. Squire asking the court to confront that question. We are defending gun rights and the limits our Founders placed on federal power.
This legal work is possible because people support America’s Future. I’m grateful to every one of you who has stood with us. If you want to help us continue these legal battles for our rights, you can donate on our organization’s website.
I explain what is at stake in my new article.
https://www.generalflynn.com/united-states-v-squire-gun-rights-commerce-clause
What does it mean and what does it take to be an American?
Check out what America’s Future is doing to protect our God-given rights.
https://www.americasfuture.net/newsletter/defend-the-constitution-protect-our-future/
Let me tell you something straight up—President Trump’s tariffs are a bold, decisive strike for America’s soul. This isn’t just about trade; it’s about taking back what’s ours—our jobs, industries, and our pride. For too long, we’ve let the globalists and the weak-kneed elites sell us out to foreign powers who don’t give a damn about the American worker.